"Find the smallest unit of change that can prove the value of your idea."
It's like recently, I see the "work in small batches" pattern everywhere.
This one, though, is partially about circumventing corporate power structure, and only partially about design.
I'd be curious about your take in a situation where we could largely ignore the politics, e.g., when one has enough situtional power to propose a big change as well as a small one.
My intuition would still be:
- suggest a small one
- learn from the outcomes
- improve on/design the follow-up steps with the new information at hand
- suggest another change
- repeat
Is there a strong case for big design changes (in general; I reckon there always are edge cases)?
"Find the smallest unit of change that can prove the value of your idea."
It's like recently, I see the "work in small batches" pattern everywhere.
This one, though, is partially about circumventing corporate power structure, and only partially about design.
I'd be curious about your take in a situation where we could largely ignore the politics, e.g., when one has enough situtional power to propose a big change as well as a small one.
My intuition would still be:
- suggest a small one
- learn from the outcomes
- improve on/design the follow-up steps with the new information at hand
- suggest another change
- repeat
Is there a strong case for big design changes (in general; I reckon there always are edge cases)?